Collaborative Teaching Models: Mainstreaming Students with Disabilities
Keywords:
Inclusive education, Individualized Education Plan, Special education servicesAbstract
Collaborative teaching models, particularly those focused on mainstreaming students with disabilities, have gained prominence in recent years within the field of education. These models emphasize the inclusion of students with diverse learning needs into regular classroom settings, fostering a more inclusive and equitable educational environment. This approach aims to break down barriers and promote social integration while also providing students with disabilities access to the same educational opportunities as their peers. In collaborative teaching models, educators work closely together to create a cohesive and supportive learning environment. This often involves special education teachers and general education teachers collaborating to develop and implement individualized education plans (IEPs) tailored to each student's unique needs. By blending the expertise of these professionals, the goal is to address a wide range of learning abilities, styles, and challenges effectively. One key aspect of mainstreaming students with disabilities is the encouragement of peer interaction and the development of social skills.
References
Hall, T. E., Strangman, N., & Meyer, A. (2003). Differentiated instruction and implications for UDL implementation. Wakefield, MA: National Center on Accessing the General Curriculum. Retrieved from http://aem.cast.org/about/publications/2003/ncac-differentiated-instruction-udl-implementation-udl.html
Pisha, B., & Coyne, P. (2001). Smart from the start: The promise of universal design for learning. Remedial and Special Education, 22(4), 197-203. Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) Amendments of 1997. (1997). Pub. L. No. 105-17, 111 Stat. 37.
National Center for Learning Disabilities. (n.d.). Inclusive education and students with learning disabilities: Research review. Retrieved from https://www.ncld.org/research/inclusive-education/inclusive-education-research-review
Ainscow, M., Booth, T., & Dyson, A. (2006). Understanding and developing inclusive practices in schools: A collaborative action research network. Routledge.
Scruggs, T. E., Mastropieri, M. A., & McDuffie, K. A. (2007). Co-Teaching in Inclusive Classrooms: A Metasynthesis of Qualitative Research. Exceptional Children, 73(4), 392-416.
Cook, B. G., Tankersley, M., & Landrum, T. J. (2009). Determining evidence-based practices in special education. Exceptional Children, 75(3), 365-383.
National Association of State Directors of Special Education (NASDSE). (2007). The seven principles of universal design for learning (UDL): A framework for addressing the applicability of UDL in secondary education. Retrieved from https://www.nasdse.org/docs/SevenPrinciples.pdf
Artiles, A. J., & Trent, S. C. (1994). Overrepresentation of minority students in special education: A continuing debate. The Journal of Special Education, 27(4), 410-437.
UNESCO. (1994). The Salamanca Statement and Framework for Action on Special Needs Education. Retrieved from https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000098466
Janney, R., & Snell, M. E. (2013). Collaborative teaming. Brookes Publishing.
Kluth, P., & Straut, D. (2003). Access to academics for all students: Critical approaches to inclusive curriculum, instruction, and policy. Erlbaum.
Giangreco, M. F., & Broer, S. M. (2005). Questionable utilization of paraprofessionals in inclusive schools: Are we addressing symptoms or causes? Focus on Exceptional Children, 38(7), 1-24.
